Brake pad technical advice

Dynamometer Brake Testing

Scope

This article aims to promote a better understanding of brake testing in general and, more specifically, to assist the reader in understanding the basic principles of a brake test dynamometer and how to interpret a Dynamometer Test Report.

Introduction

In order to discuss how a dynamometer works it is worth looking at its history, as well as understanding the origin and concept of Power, which is the unit that a dynamometer measures.

To the knowledge of the writer the word “Dynamometer” is probably derived from the unit “dyne”. One Dyne is the force required to cause a mass of one gram to accelerate at a rate of one centimetre per second per second in the absence of other force-producing effects. [1] This unit is rarely used today and is discouraged in favour of the Newton (N) that is part of the SI system.

During the 18th century James Watt, inventor of the steam engine (in about 1775), introduced a unit of power to compare the power of a steam engine with a more familiar source of power. Watt learned “that a strong horse could lift 150 pounds to a height of 220 feet in 1 minute.” This amount of work he called 1 Horsepower. [2] This unit of power can also be defined as the amount of power required to lift a 550-pound weight one foot high in one second.

During the next 200 years the first dynamometer was designed to measure the brake Horsepower of a motor. This invention was the work of an engineer, Gaspard Clair Francois Marie Riche de Prony (1755-1839). He invented the Prony Brake Dynamometer in 1821 in Paris [3]. Variations of this dynamometer are still in use today. (See the quoted relevant source of this information for a diagram of his dynamometer and accompanying calculations.) – Charles Babbage is also mentioned as the inventor of the Dynamometer.

Back to top

The Modern Brake Dynamometer

A modern brake test Dynamometer uses an absorption unit, in this case a brake disk and calliper assembly, to dissipate or convert the power or kinetic energy into heat or thermal energy. The power used to do this is calculated as follows:

Horsepower = Torque x RPM / 5252

Remember that RPM is Revolutions per Minute and the unit for Torque in this instance is measured in foot/pounds. 5252 is a constant and is also derived from Watt’s observation.

The above imperial system for units of measure is used to provide the Horsepower formula as it describes the origins of the measure of power best. The SI system or metric system uses, amongst other units, kilowatts (Kw) in place of horsepower and Newton-meter (Nm) for torque.

With a modern dynamometer, such as is used by ECE-90 Brake Testing (Pty) Ltd, the Dynamometer Test Report uses Newton Meter (Nm) and the Friction-coefficient (Mu) as a unit and ratio of measure respectively.

Basic Construction

The dynamometer used to generate the test report used in this article is constructed as shown below.

Fig. 1 - Dynamometer
Fig. 1 - Dynamometer

A Dynamometer consists of the following main elements. (See Fig.1 above)
  1. The drive-train (revolving assembly) consists of the following elements: Motor (1), Interchangeable flywheels (2) and Brake Disk (3). The flywheels and brake disk is matched to the part number to be tested.
      
  2. The test bed (mounted in bearings aligned with the drive-train but held in position with the load arm. It has therefor the potential to rotate but is retained by the load arm) The test bed consist of the following elements: Calliper & Adapter (4), Power transfer axle (5), Load Bearing Arm (6) and Loadcell.
Operation
  1. The motor (1) is engaged and accelerated to the required speed and then disengaged to allow the drive-train assembly to run free as a result of the inertia generated by the flywheel (2). It follows that the Brake Disk (3) is spinning with this assembly.
      
  2. The brake is then applied, using a brake booster similar as is fitted in road vehicles, which in turn activates the piston in the Calliper (4), causing the brake pads that are being tested to clamp onto the Brake Disk (3). (The brake pressure is measured during this operation in Bar)
      
  3. This causes the drive-train to be stopped against the inertia generated by the flywheel (2) The kinetic energy generated by the flywheel is matched to the energy that would be generated by a road vehicle of the brake pad reference being tested. The formula used for determining the kinetic energy is: E = ½mv²
      
  4. During the braking operation the Calliper assembly (4), which has the potential to rotate about the same axes as the drive-train, is forced in the same turning direction but is constrained by the Load Arm(5). The Loadcell (6) act as an anchor or pedestal between the Load Arm (5) and the chassis of the dynamometer.
      
  5. As a result of the action described in 4 above, the Loadcell is placed under strain which in turn is designed to gauge/measure this strain it is subjected to. The Loadcell then transmits this information, in real time, to the computer that controls the Dynamometer. (This is how torque is measured in Nm)
      
  6. Further to the above a rubbing thermocouple is placed against the Brake Disk (3) which measures the disk temperature during the test program. (Measurement is in °C)
Back to top

Dynamometer Testing

Overview

It is mandatory that all replacement brake lining assemblies in South Africa complies with a minimum specification as is published in the Government Gazette No. 22014 of 2 February 2001. This specification is also known as VC8053.

The above specification is regulated by the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS).

In addition to this, a new and more stringent specification will soon be adopted and is referred to as ECE Regulation 90. This regulation is already in place in Europe. Any South African manufacturer that wishes to export to Europe and who complies with this regulation will obviously be favoured.

In principal ECE Regulation 90 tests uses some portions of the VC8053 specification but, in addition, specifies road tests. ECE Regulation 90 is also vehicle or reference specific. It does not, however, provide the manufacturer with generic compliance, as is the case with VC8053.

brake pads Comparison Between ECE Regulation 90 and SA Compulsory Specification of February 2001

It is worth commenting that regulation ECE 90 should be welcomed by progressive brake lining manufacturers as compliance to it, notwithstanding its obvious commercial value, is beneficial to all road users in South Africa due to the safety aspects involved.

Back to top
Test Design

It is logical to conclude that dynamometer tests will be designed using the above specifications as a guide. These specifications are specific about the required testing and go as far as to supply the pressures, speeds, temperatures and torque’s required to do the testing.

A test report should supply the required results in a format that would be recognised by engineers world-wide. Such a report is supplied by ECE-90 Brake Testing (Pty) Ltd and is discussed in some detail below.

Fig 2 - Dynamometer Results Data Sheet
Fig. 2 Dynamometer Results Data Sheet

Test Interpretation

Dynamometer Test Overview – A short overview of the Test Sequence will be presented below, followed by a more detailed explanation of each stage supported by presenting actual portions of the complete test sheet that is shown above. This will assist the reader to have a better understanding when interpreting a test.

  1. Brake pad bedding-in procedure. In order to do a test the friction surface of the pad need to be bedded-in first of all. This is to ensure a proper contact surface between disk and pad. (For the same reason one should drive careful for the 1st 100 km’s when a vehicle was fitted with new pads. Also see article on Burnishing) There are proposed bedding-in procedures in existence but this portion of the test is not regulated as such. It is therefore up to the manufacturer to specify a specific and suitable procedure. For this reason it is common that a full dynamometer test is used for bedding-in.
      
  2. Test Preparation. After the bedding-in cycle the pads are removed from the calliper, weighed and measure for thickness. The pads are then replaced when the weight and thickness measurements as well as the other relevant information have been entered into the control program. (See Fig. 2 above, the General Information call-out.)
     
  3. 3 stops at 30 km/h are then done to heat up the brake pad samples but are not reported on the Test Sheet.
      
  4. 3 stops at 40 km/h are done at the predetermined pressure. The average torque is inserted under Test Results Type-O (40 km/h). (VC8053 & ECE90 requirement) – See plot in Speed Sensitivity area
       
  5. 3 stops at 80 km/h are done at the predetermined pressure. The average torque is inserted under Test Results Type-O (80 km/h) (VC8053 & ECE90 requirement) – See plot in Speed Sensitivity area
      
  6. 3 stops at 120 km/h are done at the predetermined pressure. The average torque is inserted under Test Results Type-O (120 km/h) (VC8053 & ECE90 requirement) – See plot in Speed Sensitivity area
      
  7. 3 stops at 160 km/h are done at the predetermined pressure. The average torque is inserted under Test Results Type-O (160 km/h) (VC8053 & ECE90 requirement) – See plot in Speed Sensitivity area
      
  8. 3 stops then done to calculate maximum pressure values for the Cold Performance Equivalence Test as well as the pressures for the residual performance test. These are not reported.
      
  9. 6 stops are then done at 80Km/h but at increasing pressures for the Cold Performance Equivalence Test. – An ECE90 requirement only.
      
  10. A further 3 stops are done to determine the pressure to be used for both Fade Tests.
     
  11. 1st Fade Test – 15 repeated stops at regular intervals (eg. 45 sec. intervals from 120km/h to 60km/h.)
      
  12. 1-off residual performance stop to determine the hot performance of the brake pads.
      
  13. 2nd Fade Test – 5 more applications done at similar intervals as 1st fade (A Safeline only requirement.)
      
  14. 2nd residual performance stop (a Safeline requirement)
      
  15. Steps 4 to 7 then repeated – This is done to see the change in performance after the pads were exposed to a high heat cycle (This is done for information purposes only and is not a requirement)

TEST COMPLETED AND PRINTED

0212_dynamometer_02a.gif (27965 bytes)
Fig. 2a Dynamometer Results Data Sheet

Back to top
Test Results

The Test Results reported comply with both the ECE 90 and VC8053 regulations. By looking at the call-outs 1 to 4 in Fig. 2a above the reader is referred to a point by point explanation of the various results that is presented.

  1. In the centre column a value of 1016 Nm was inserted. This is a very important value and is used as a base point for the % Difference calculation that appears in the 3rd column. This value is obtained by fitting a set of Original Equipment (OE) brake pads in the dynamometer and then to test it to the relevant amount of stop applications to the various pressures and speeds as is stipulated in ECE 90 and VC8053 regulations. This is a test that only needs to be done once to obtain this value. By selecting the pad reference to be tested this value is drawn from a database of OE tested pads and is inserted into the test program. It follows that this value is different from reference to reference.
     
    Another value, ideal pressure in Bar, is also calculated during the OE “finger printing” test procedure. This value is also drawn from the database of OE references and used by the test program but is not supplied on the test report. It follows that this value is different from reference to reference.
      
    The value (1119 Nm) in the 1st column is the average obtained of the 3 Type-O Stops at 80Km/h. (See 5 of the Test Sequence) In column 3 in this case a 10% Difference to OE is reported. According to Regulations ECE 90 & VC8053 a difference of ±15% is allowed for after market brake linings. The pads therefore pass this portion of the test well within the requirement.
      
  2. These values, as is recorded in column 1, are the average of stops as is done during the Speed Sensitivity Test. See Fig. 2b. The value of importance is marked by the grey dots and is the average torque taken over 3 stops for the relevant speeds as shown. The Type-O (40 km/h) average is shown but does not form part of the % Diff. calculations. Although it is a meaningful and interesting value it is not required by both Regulations. Of interest to the reader at this point is to observe that all these values are not far from the recommended OE value as discussed in 1 above. By observing this the reader should get a sense of the fact that the pad that was tested compares well with an OE supplied brake pad. See the Speed Sensitivity discussion below for a better understanding of these values and how they were measured. The core idea is to understand that they are the average torque’s taken over 3 stops for the relevant speeds as shown. (These stops refer to points 4 to 7 in the Test Sequence as presented above.)
       
  3. The value in the centre column is the same as the value in 1 above, the OE requirement. The value, 650 in this case, is the Residual Performance Test result. (See point 12 of the Test Sequence.) The 64% reported is the percent calculation between the residual (hot performance) and cold performance Value. Regulations ECE 90 & VC8053 require that the hot performance of the samples on test not be less than 60% of the performance obtained when the pads were cold. The pad in this instance also passes the test. An interesting fact is that an OE pad does not have to pass this specific requirement!
       
  4. This residual value after the 2nd Fade is for observation purposes only and not a requirement. It can be noted that both these residual values does not differ much which is also a good sign.

Fig. 2b
Fig. 2b

Refer to points 5 to 8 of the Test Sequence as described above. Also see point 2 of Fig. 2a where the results of these stops are reported.

  1. The 1st Speed Sensitivity section of the test is a requirement in both regulations. These Type-O stops are plotted as in the graph above to supply a graphical indication of the test. For instance, at 40 Km/h, the average of the 3 stops, a Friction Co-efficient (Mu) of about 0.36 was achieved. At 80 Km/h the Mu was almost 0.4! (Mu, the Friction Co-efficient is simply put the value obtained by dividing the clamping force of the calliper by the driving force of the disk. Mu is therefor simply a ratio and has no “magic” attached. – The writer will soon publish a full article explaining Friction Co-efficient (Mu) in more detail.
      
  2. This is an repeat of the stops done in 5 above but after the fade tests have been done as per point 11 of the Test Interpretation described above.
      
  3. During the Cold Performance Equivalence Test 6 stops are made from 80km/h allowing the stop to zero. The stops are made at increments of pressure specified in bar, whilst the torque, reported in Nm is recorded. These stops are then plotted as per the blue line in the graph above.
      
  4. The lines in red indicate the upper and lower limits as is specified by Regulation ECE90. It is required that the torque curve obtained be within the limits in the upper two thirds of the graph. It is clear from this graph that this test passes the requirement. It follows that if the brake pads being tested do not comply the graph will be plotted well below the bottom limit and typically curving downwards.

Fig.2c
Fig.2c

Fade Test Section

  1. This indicates the pressure (information only) at which the fade test was conducted as per calculations done by the test software. (See 10. of the Test Interpretation above) The lower this pressure is the better the test pad performs. In this instance, with a test pressure of 31 bar the test pad performs well and it is close to the test pressures reported for OE pads of the same reference.
      
  2. During the fade test 15 brake applications are done at very short intervals from fairly high speed. The temperature versus the friction co-efficient is plotted together. During these stops pressure is applied which allows the pad to be tested to become very hot and as a result one can observe the behaviour of the test pad during high temperature applications. An inferior test pad will fade drastically, especially during the 1st 7 stops after which it will recover somewhat. This is also referred to as Green Fade (Please see the previous article “Burnishing of Brake Linings” for a full explanation of Green Fade)
      
  3. After completion of the total Dynamometer test the Wear and Mass loss is calculated and reported in this position. Although this is not a wear test per say it does give one an idea of durability, especially when compared to other tests. There are specifically designed wear tests but is not within the scope of this article. Mass loss is of interest to the manufacturer of the brake pad and is specific to the friction material being tested. It is not an indication of pad performance as such and is of academic value only to the layman.
      
  4. This graph shows a second fade test and is not required by Regulation ECE90 requirement of Safeline as a further indication of pad performance. Temperature and Mu is plotted for a further 5 brake applications.
Back to top

Article by W. S. Scholtz
issued by Safeline: November 2002

brakepads

For other Technical Articles please visit our Archives

Sources:
Brake pads by Safeline
Safeline Marketing (Pty)Ltd | P.O. Box 1559, Roosevelt Park, South Africa 2129
 | Tel: 2711 549 7333  | Fax: 2711 549 7500 | Email contacts | Brake pads site map
Site by: E-SPECTATIONS.COM web site marketing